Personal injury, wrongful death, and Medical Malpractice lawyers in New York

On www.newyorkinjuries.com Levine & Slavit, our personal injury lawyers are always up-to-date with the latest case law. For example, it has a change recently about the Fire Code in the State of New York. If you live in New York City and believe that you need one of wrongful death, medical malpractice and personal injury lawyers have offices in our Manhattan or Long Iceland, please contact us as soon as possible by visiting our website www.newyorkinjuries.com. You can check with our personalInjury lawyers Leonard S. Slavit and Ira S. Levine & Slavit Slavit at The Lincoln Building 60 East 42nd St. Ste 1614 New York, NY 10 165 Phone: 212-687-2777 350 Willis Ave. Mineola, New York 11 501 Telephone: 516-294-8282 Toll Free: (888) LAW-8088 Website: www.newyorkinjuries.com



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvtdueSyMPk&hl=en

Auto Accident Settlement - 3 common ailments to get a Car Insurance Settlement

Do you want to get a car accident settlement? In this article we are at about 3 common ailments that can get you to talk to a car insurance settlement.

None of us expect to be involved in an accident. I am sure that we do not look forward to the pain and suffering that can go along with the whole situation. In this article we will be at 3 common ailments, you may receive an auto insurance settlement are discussed.

Number 1 - whip

Whiplashsomething that very often when someone goes through a car accident. When somebody hits you from behind that experience, and you could possibly severe neck pain.

Number 2 - back injury

A back injury is another common injury that can occur. If you are a back injury, it can treat a very expensive thing. You either have to undergo an operation, or go to the chiropractor see 3 or more times per week.

No. 3 -Broken Nose

While you may not believe that would be a broken nose to be very serious, it can be. If you experience a broken nose, then you will know that your nose is healed, even after it difficult to breathe. If your nose was broken, you may need reconstructive surgery to be able to breathe as you had before it was interrupted. Not only will you may not be able to breathe directly after this incident, but your facial features can also be changed. I have known many people have thatNoses, a crooked, because he had broken with them.

These are 3 common things that you may suffer from a car accident. If you believe that you have at a car accident settlement, I would talk to a lawyer are entitled.

What does a Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice Lawyer do?

It helps to navigate the murky waters, the case of an unsuspecting victim in mud and filth.

If a person slips and falls that can cause injuries, your attorney to find out why you slipped.

Was there a defect on the property that should have been resolved? Was it simply that you do not see where you went? Was not the stairs to make the code so it dangerous? These are the questions that your lawyer will have to investigate.

Products caused> Injuries

This is known as product liability. Suppose you opened a bottle of soda and the cap exploded from the bottle and into the eye causing permanent damage. If the bottling company to blame? Maybe. How about a miter saw is to a guard on your fingers as you slide the wood is protected in the cutting knife? How about a car that you can with the gear into reverse without taking your foot on the brake before? (This will prevent a gear into each otherChildren from playing with the shifter. It has happened, where they slip the gears into reverse and the car begins to move to injury).

Evaluation of a product which is widely used or bought, can be highly technical. Often we need to hire engineers to evaluate the product to see whether it was properly designed and properly marketed.

Medical malpractice

Misconduct is causing a departure from good and accepted medical care and injuries.How will each person, the doctors held accountable for their actions, as we all are. In order to evidence of wrongdoing, we must have medical experts review your documents before you confirm to start a process for your injuries. Most cases that I see in my office do not start with the strict criteria for the position to a case. Which we assume, some go to trial, and others will be resolved before the hearing.

Malpractice cases are one of the most controversial areas of law today. TheDefender we meet often, are very well educated and trained in the defense of these processes.

Car Accidents

We all know the terrible reputation of lawyers from all these tacky displays advertisements damaged cars and people in wheelchairs get up poster-sized checks, with lots of zeros after a certain number.

But the fact that very serious injuries and injuries resulting from these terrible events. Life destroyed by a momentNegligence. Just look around, how many people are still talking on the phone while driving, even though it is against the law!

Most people are not in these informative newsletters, because luckily interested to be a tragedy not happened to them. That's ok. We hope that it never. The purpose of this newsletter is to my readers an understanding of what we do as lawyers, and how we can help, if need be. You'll find that I like my readers informed about their options beforethey ever need a lawyer, and before they even set foot in the office of a lawyer. Like many other lawyers you know who done it?

In an accident case, I am pleased to see how the accident occurred. Where were you going? What were the road conditions? Was your vehicle in good mechanical condition? Was someone faster? Does anyone use when they would not spin? Was involved in nonsense? (Think about where Turkey has suffered from a passing car threw drive serious damage to the woman) behind them.

While going about our daily lives, we should not always take care of the wounded. Common sense should determine what is good leadership and what does not. Unfortunately, there are many people who just casually, as are their daily activities. Have we not seen all the people who read the newspaper, while stuck in traffic, and they are driving! How about applying makeup on the way to work, and drive at the same time?

ImagineScenario ...

A woman is late for work.

It is creeping into their cars and traffic. She's who see makeup and look in the mirror, whether it is right on. At the same time their phone rings, and while they answer, they decided to light her cigarette. Unfortunately for them, the car is easier on their feet, and now she has her lipstick in one hand and the phone in the other, a cigarette in his mouth, and they may be adopted, attention tothe street.

Can you hear not only visualize the accident in your head, and the crushing of metal, as their eyes are lighter on the floor in search of? Believe me, there are many cases like this that other people have caused injury.

Imagine if people were never sloppy! There would be no accidents, no need for insurance and there would be no personal injury lawsuits. Unfortunately, we are not perfect and accidents happen.

But how do you decidewhether the accident was something that can not be avoided, or could, was the result of a lack of attention? We need a thorough and detailed investigation.

Remember, if an injured victim comes to us, they will tell us what has happened to them from their perspective. We need to investigate and make sure that all other considerations can confirm) (witnesses who have heard what we do. If we do confirm that, we can then build your case and the results that led to your injury.

DogBites

Did you know that certain types of dogs are more susceptible than others to bite someone? Let's look at the pit bull, for example. Just because a pit bull bites someone, as opposed to a tiny Chihuahua that mean to be made the owner of the dog responsible? The answer depends on many factors.

If the dog has never before malignant tendencies and has never bitten anyone before, how can the owner be responsible for this biting episode? One could argue that all pitBulls in general are violent by nature. Not a bad argument to make, but also not quite accurate. What happens when you learn that was before the bite, the dog is always teased and tormented by a guest? Would things change? Of course would be.

Injustice, humiliation and psychological injuries

We can all say, if an injury happens

Someone passed by, because the color of his skin of people who are different in the neighborhood.

Somebody will be refused entryto a club because their religious beliefs than those who run the club differently.

Someone refused service in a restaurant because of the way they dress or the accent of her voice. How about a woman who was denied a partnership because she was pregnant? What about the disgrace of a high school football player who was sexually abused while at football training camp with his high school team?

Despite all our progress, there is still bigotry, prejudice and hatredin this country. If you are a victim of injustice or humiliation, what you can do about it? There are certain types of lawsuits that seek to allow the victims of injustice, justice. They are sometimes called discrimination litigation, and violation of civil rights complaints. The pain caused by injustice can be devastating and long-term social and psychological impact.

Your lawyer will ask your history, both medical and psychological. You'll probably be asked to have specificpsychological testing and counseling to confirm and identify some of the problems you are currently experiencing.

I know that some people believe that if a violation can not be seen, that is, it is less meaningful than a horrible disfiguring injuries. This is not always true.

I bet there is something in all of childhood, where she can remember a parent or an older child to say something bad about you. In retrospect, all these years, do you still remember vividly the injuredYou will learn that day. This is unfair. There is no "physical" injuries, but the emotional scar is omnipresent.

So, "What does a lawyer do?"

An attorney is someone who will guide you to help you through your trouble, and the law for you and explain how the law applies to facts. A lawyer should advise you about your legal options and what you can do to correct the injustices that have happened to you, too. That's what a good lawyer.

Medical malpractice: 10 Reasons Why Most Malpractice Victims

Learn the Top 10 reasons why most victims of medical malpractice can not recover any money. Listen, as explained Gerry Oginski, a NY Medical Malpractice Lawyer attorney in Brooklyn, Manhattan, Bronx, Queens, Staten Iceland, Iceland Long, Nassau and Suffolk, why this is so. For more information on Gerry's popular website, www.oginski-law.com or call Gerry personally at 516-487-8207.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UGnPygBWn8&hl=en

Queens Bicycle Rider on a T-junction, NY Accident Attorney Explains Hit

www.oginski-law.com Find out what happens when a cyclist his own business hats on a beautiful sunny spring day near the Grand Central Parkway in Queens, is taken across a careless and reckless driver who did not bother look both ways before proceedings in an intersection. Learning acted negligently by Gerry Oginski you, an experienced New York accident and personal injury trial lawyer, why the driver of the car was, and this traumatic accident could easily be avoided. More ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z_H4bvkhRA&hl=en

15 Key Deposition Techniques in a medical malpractice in Case

ASK THE DEFENDANT DOCTOR

WARNING:
Preparation is the key to the entire deposition of a physician. You need to spend countless hours reviewing the entire file, reviewing all medical records, notes and entries in the table. You need to know and test your theory of liability, causation and damages before you begin to examine the file. You need to keep in mind something in the table that will help you in your quest to prove each element of liability, causation andDamage.

1. Most lawyers ask the same boring questions at the beginning of every deposition:

a. Give your name and address
b. Enter your qualifications, pedigree, school, etc.

Comment: OK, that's fine, but very boring and very expected by counsel and the doctor. Mix it up a bit. I would argue, not the creation of a physician deposition in this way. Why do not you go directly to the heart of the matter with the first question? You can always doctor the mandate, the delay orat the end. In addition, the credentials are usually to be found online or in a curriculum vitae, and determine not only where he went to school and whether he will help the Board in a special-certified. If more than one occasion, the doctor has been disoriented by this approach. They are usually prepared for questions in a lock-step manner and do not expect anything unusual, but legally permitted number of questions right away.

2. Go ahead-ask why they operated on the wrong side of thethe brain as your first question. "Objection, no foundation," said the defender. "Where is it in the CPLR, I put a question foundation?" Despite this exchange of 'ideas', if you get such an objection, then simply ask:

a. "Did not you work on my client at this time?"
b. "Is not it true that you operated on the wrong leg?"
c. "Why?"

3. I always advocate asking the 'why' question at the deposition. It's much better to know the reasons why aPhysician was or not, something not now save the issue before the court. At trial, can be the reason, with devastating consequences for our case, and if so, I want to know now. Moreover, if you yourself to a doctor at trial, as an adverse witness, you never want to reply to a question where you do not know the answer, ask. If you do, you subject yourself, your customers and your case fraught with risks that could jeopardize the case.

4. Make the doctor read his notes into the record. This is important forAnyone who tries to decipher the doctor later handwriting. Your expert must know definitely whether the scribble is important, and the only way to do this, if the doctor declares on the record, what it means to scribble.

5. Be polite. At all times. You can not imagine not hear how many lawyers, this recommendation. They think they know it all, are sarcastic, belligerent, annoying, and really annoy everyone in the room. The physician attitude in responding changeswell. It is no longer the doctor in such detail. No longer see the doctor more, as the perpetrators. Rather, it could begin to look like a victim, if kept attacking him and his credibility.

6. You can still all points without screaming hostile, angry or crying. The old adage "You get more with honey than with vinegar speaks' volumes. Obviously, you will not bend over and sweet way you always speak the physician attendance, as he screwed up. But,The key is professionally and expertly. You gain more respect from your opponent (not through lack of respect or they respectfully ask the doctor worries) of, as you do if you are antagonistic.

7. There are times when you're angry with the doctor. You want to know if you can push his buttons. They want to know how easy it is to rankle his composure is. If it easy to do deposit your study strategy toward this witness just so much easier.

8. Learn more aboutThe doctor had discussions with the patient, family members and other doctors. Remember, conversations are rarely recorded in a hospital. Make sure you ask the doctor to confirm or deny comments that your client has testified about. In most cases, the doctor will no longer claim that they remember about the conversation. But if your client does not, it's much more likely that the conversation took place. If the doctor denies making certain comments, then you know you have different facts about the sameConversation and a jury must ultimately decide who is telling the truth.

9. Ask if the doctor ever had his license suspended and / or revoked practice.

a. Ask if your hospital privileges ever been suspended or provoked.

b. Always ask if the physician has given testimony before.

i. Ask if there is an expert for plaintiff or defendant
ii. Ask if they have one doctor
iii. Ask, which was kind of case, andthe name of the case
iv. Ask if they were paid for their time to testify in the case law on this matter

10. In New York, in a medical malpractice deposition, you must ask opinion questions. The doctor as a defendant is obliged to answer 'expert' questions and answers about his medical advice.

a. Do you have an opinion, with reasonable probability that medical treatment was made to Mrs. X is necessary and in the standard ofcare?

b. If you have an opinion, what is that opinion?

c. Confront the doctor with other opinions in the medical community that disagree with his school of thought and ask what he thinks of those opinions.

d. Ask the doctor to admit to certain facts- Here's an example:

i. Isn't it true the patient got Ex-lax at 10 p.m.?

ii. Isn't it true that patients with colon tumors shouldn't get ex-lax?

iii. Are there any circumstances when you would prescribe this Medication for a patient who had this tumor?

iv. Would you agree that if the patient received ex-lax at 10 clock, that would be a departure from good care?

v. Would you agree that the only reason why the patient suffered injuries, because they got ex-lax at 10 clock?

vi. Would you agree if she had not gotten around to the ex-lax, would be at 10 clock, have not they suffered the bowel perforation?

11. Make sure to exclude other possible causes of injury in addition to the wrongdoing that youclaim here occurred. The reason why you do this is to learn the potential defense to your case. The defense is always an explanation of why your argument is invalid. Better you should learn it during the deposition rather than at the top before the court without knowing what their defense will be.

12. Ask lots of open questions. Questions of who / what / where / when / why / how. In this way you get to speak to the doctor and explain. If the doctor is going on and, while not directlyAnswering the question and his lawyer lets him-that's ok. Let him always talking, you might actually some useful information. When he stops talking, just say: "Maybe my question was not clear doctor. What I sought was .... you can answer this question?" Always take the blame if the doctor says, the question is not clear. Do not respond to him with the question "What do you understand about my English question?"

13. Ask for medical definitions.

a. Whatis an endocervical curettage?
b. What is a heart attack?
c. What is hypoxia?
d. Ask if these definitions are commonly accepted in the medical community, or whether there are other schools accepted definitions.

14. Questions whether it is a medical literature or textbooks until they have verified to the deposit.

a. Do you have any with you?
b. What contributions do you have?
c. What have you got from the article? Does it support your positionhere, or was it rather, to your position?

15. Lastly but not least, ask for references, training, licensing, certification board, but you should already have this information before your deposition when you research the defendant doctor. I have seen always do a Google search for the doctor to lawyer to see if they have something written, or if there is something out there online that is worth knowing. I recently learned from an online search, where the defendant was fired from his doctorResidence and sued the chairman of his department. Needless to say, this information proved very useful for the deposition.

___________________________

There are many books about the behavior of statements written. The most important factor in considering a physician's deposition, in my opinion, the experience of the lawyer while the survey. Who can read from a prepared list of questions. It takes an experienced attorney to listen to the answers andknow where you want to go and then a strategy on how to get there and protect your customers the rights to develop the best of your abilities.

NY Medical Malpractice - Surgeon Cuts Optic Nerve, which cause permanent blindness

Here is an example of a case, is that I recently treated

A man was robbed and suffered a fracture of the bone around the eye. One of the muscles that control movement of the eye was slightly in the broken bone stuck. The result was that he could move his eyes at a certain point. Since he only his eyes move up to a certain point, he had some double vision. However, if one eye, he had a perfect view in mind that the movement had been restricted.

The man went toan ophthalmologist, who was connected with his family doctor. The ophthalmologist examined the man and assured him that the procedure "routine" and there was nothing to fear. "The doctor had this type of surgery done many times before," he said. The plan was to remove the muscle from the bone fragment, and then fix the bone. "They should have no problem with sight after the operation," said the optometrist.

The patient had the surgery as planned. He has never tried asecond opinion, as he asserts, was the ophthalmologist capable to do the procedure. He was never mentioned, was of an ophthalmologist, not only this type of surgery. The reason, as I learned later was that the medical group did not want to give the patient an "outside" doctor, because they would lose money if he was operated on elsewhere.

Operation went well, so that the patient or thoughts. A patch catch your eye, and he was invited back the next day. The next day he returned to theDoctor's office, had removed the pavement and was asked: "Well, what do you mean?" The patient replied, "I see nothing. Did you remove the patch?"

In desperation, the eye doctor quickly examined the patient and found that there appeared a great problem-optic dead. You should repeat the patient immediately after surgery, later that day. The patient is operated on the afternoon in an attempt to back his vision. During the second operation, I have learned during theCourse of action the patient that the doctor first checks the muscles. That was good. The doctor reviewed the MRI that was taken directly before the second operation. The MRI showed that the optic nerve was cut through and through. It was torn into two halves. That is why the patient lost his vision.

Despite the MRI found that the eye doctor confirmed this unfortunate fact in the second operation. There was nothing to be done, could to fix the severed optic nerve. The patient wouldnever see again in the eye.

While the complaint of the patients I have learned that the eye doctor had done only a handful of these procedures. Most of these cases were of specialist eye doctors that this procedure done on a regular basis. During the event, the ophthalmologist lawyer tries to get the doctor dismissed from the case and claimed that this doctor everything possible to help the patient was. Yes, everything is done after this doctor had been negligent andcarelessly cut the optic nerve. The two most important issues in the case were (1) that the doctor did not have enough experience to do this operation, and (2) The doctor cut the nerve that controls eyesight and never acknowledged that the optic nerve has been solved . Because of the significant problems that have tried in this case the doctor who is himself from the case. I was able to obtain full and adequate compensation for the loss of vision of this man in front just before the case wentTrial.

Unfortunately for the patient, despite receiving substantial compensation, he will live his life with vision in only one eye. Every expert who reviewed this case confirms that this was entirely preventable medical errors.